Recent comments in /f/sports

LovelyDadBod t1_j32iwy9 wrote

I’m a goaltender, have been since I was 8-9 and still play regularly in my 30’s. I also ref.

First one is only interference strictly by the IIHF rules. North American refs would have called it a good goal as it was really incidental contact that also wouldn’t have happened if the D-man didn’t hit him towards the goalie.

Second one was 100% a no-goal

1

timeIsAllitTakes t1_j32c3ng wrote

Also the Reyna's started this whole mess by saying Reyna wasn't injured and there was more to his lack of playing time. GGG gave him an out and he didn't take it. Now this makes Gio look less like a dumb kid that made an oops in camp but part of a family where this is a systemic problem

2

rpgguy_1o1 t1_j326kaj wrote

Yeah, Milic came up clutch a number of times. USA looked great in the neutral zone, had a lot of great chances in the slot. The US just had no presence in front of their own net, that killed them other than the empty netter, and Canada's 4th line goal I think each goal was either in the blue paint or just outside of it. Even that 4th goal was close in the slot.

They even bounced back well after the first Goalie Interference, which was still questionable in my eyes, the second was clear GI.

It was a miracle that the weird bounce off of Milic on the US PP, which ended up right in front of the empty crease didn't end up in the back of the net.

6